To register for an Internet.com membership to receive newsletters and white papers, use the Register button ABOVE.
To participate in the message forums BELOW, click here

Go Back   IT Management Forum > IT Service Management

IT Service Management Discussion about ITSM and ITIL including Certification and recent itSMF events.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2004, 08:45 PM
alphasong alphasong is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 20
IT Portfolio Management at Merrill Lynch

Is it a CMDB? A metadata repository? They don't call it either; it's the "IT Data Warehouse."

DB2 Magazine (a freebie one gets with Intelligent Enterprise) has a GREAT four-page article by VP Howard Goldberg on Merrill Lynch's approach to managing internal IT data here.

Here's an extended quote:

In order to reduce costs and improve operational efficiencies, Merrill Lynch realized it needed a comprehensive picture of the environment to:

Improve productivity by making it easier for employees to find what they need
Eliminate duplicated efforts in different business units
Prevent poor decisions based on faulty information.

The information to create this comprehensive picture of the IT environment existed, but was stored in heterogeneous and fragmented data silos that were inconsistently sourced and refreshed. A simple question such as "How many servers are running Windows NT?" would generate multiple unsupported answers...The team charged with creating this comprehensive IT picture found an established infrastructure and methodology in Merrill Lynch's existing data warehouse practice....


Would love to hear some discussion of this piece and how it fits into folk's various visions of IT Service Management and Metadata Management. On the surface, it seems the CMDB might be a feed into this (that's kind of the model Merrill Lynch is using, with feeds from some management frameworks at least). However, some conceptions of CMDBs I have read imply that the CMDB is used directly for reporting and analytics - so why would one implement a separate decision-support architecture?

(The classic model is that online transactional databases replicate their data into data warehouses for analytics, but this idea hasn't been part of the ITSM discussions I've seen.)

Question I would have for Merrill Lynch: What are the processes for keeping all this data up to date? This seems very close to the traditional metadata repository approach, in which IT process is "someone else's problem." As I've noted elsewhere, this is the historic weakness of metadata as a practice.

Cheers!

Charlie

from www.erp4it.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.





Acceptable Use Policy


The Network for Technology Professionals

Search:

About Internet.com

Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0